Dota 2: Zero Tenacity vs Ilbirs eSports (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group B - Jul 24, 2026

Live Polymarket analytics for Dota 2: Zero Tenacity vs Ilbirs eSports (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group B - Jul 24, 2026 — $300K volume. Whale positions, bot activity, and order book depth on PolyCollect.

Dota 2: Zero Tenacity vs Ilbirs eSports (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group B

Dota 2: Zero Tenacity vs Ilbirs eSports (BO3) - EPL Masters Play-In Group B

Live

Leading Outcomes

  • Game Handicap: ILL (-1.5) vs Zero Tenacity (+1.5)

    100%
  • Game 1: Any Player Ultra Kill

    100%
  • Game 1: Both Teams Destroy Barracks

    91%
  • Game 2: Ends in Daytime

    91%
  • Game 1: Both Teams Beat Roshan

    90%

Key metrics

Total Volume
$300K
Liquidity
$447K
Score
Spread
N/A
Ends
1d
Whales

Outcome Analysis

Per-outcome prices, flow & whale positions

Related Markets

Trending

Trending by 24h net flow

Resolution Criteria

This market refers to the Dota 2 match between Zero Tenacity and Ilbirs eSports in the EPL Masters Play-In Group B, initially scheduled for July 24 at 12:00PM ET.

This market will resolve to "Zero Tenacity" if Zero Tenacity win the match against Ilbirs eSports.

This market will resolve to "Ilbirs eSports" if Ilbirs eSports win the match against Zero Tenacity.

If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50.

If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins.

If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.

The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.

In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.